US media: China’s military equipment is only blowing badly, such as 歼20 is unlikely to pose a threat to the US plane.

On November 2nd, Bloomberg News published an article entitled "China's new fighters are impressive, but are they true?", authored by Tobin Hawshaw, compiled as follows:

The Chinese Air Force demonstrated its new 隐-20 stealth fighter. It claims to be the so-called 5th generation fighter, similar to the American F-22 and F-35 fighters. The two J-20 fighters flew only a few minutes at the Zhuhai Air Show on the 1st, which made military experts have different views on the actual performance of the J-20 fighters. "Weekweek" Bradley Peret issued a warning: "Obviously, (this is) a huge improvement in China's combat capability." Greg Walden of the flight international website believes that the flight show revealed The biggest message is "We know that it is very noisy."

On November 1, the 11th Zhuhai Airshow was grandly opened. At about 10:30 in the morning, two æ­¼-20 fourth-generation fighters appeared and airborne demonstrations were held.

If the sporadic details revealed by the Chinese and the speculations of those who understand the military insider are correct, then once the situation in the South China Sea changes, this fighter may pose a certain threat to the US military. It is said that this type of fighter aircraft has a longer flight distance and more weapons than the American fighters against it. Although it is unlikely to pose a huge threat to US warplanes, it can easily attack US tankers and reconnaissance planes.

However, in the eyes of US officials, these capabilities exist only in rumors. This is the common theme of Western concerns about China's advanced military capabilities: no one knows whether it is true or not.

Think about the "aircraft carrier killer" of the Chinese army (Dongfeng-21 missile). The missile was unveiled in 2015 at the commemoration ceremony in China to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the end of the Second World War. The media has touted it as the fastest missile in the world. The US military speculates that it has a radar that can exceed the horizon and a mobile warhead so that it can be accurately guided as it approaches the target. Some experts therefore warned that the US aircraft carrier era has ended.

However, there is no evidence that the missile is authentic or that China has any ability to worry about the West. The Eagle Strike-12 anti-ship missile can be said to be the same. It is said to be able to fly close to the surface of the water, thus avoiding radar tracking. Although these weapons have been seen in military parades, parades, and air shows, the real question is what the actual situation is. "Everything" magazine analyst Andrew Eriksson pointed out: "China's 'hardware' continues to improve substantially, but the level of 'software' used to support is still unknown, and has not been tested by the war. Dongfeng-21 missile The component composition has been proven through multiple tests, but China’s ability to use such missiles to attack moving targets on open oceans remains unproven."

There is also the new 093B nuclear submarine. Some people worry that it may be as deadly as the US Navy's Los Angeles-class submarine. Gary Hendrix of the New American Security Center pointed out: "The 093B submarine was built to mimic the US Los Angeles-class submarine and improved its quiet performance. Its debut proves that China is rapidly learning how to build a modern fast attack submarine." Officials are more optimistic. They point out that in the case of submarine warfare, China’s strategy is to “replace quality by quantity” as the core. It is believed that there are at least 70 submarines in Beijing, and only about 50 in the United States. The consensus of the senior Pentagon officers is that China cannot possibly achieve the technological leap that some people are worried about.

So, what does all this mean for the long-term strategy of the United States (of course, not only to strengthen our military secrets)? If we really take the threat of technological advancement in China, we should first review and build 10 new Ford-class supers. Aircraft carrier plan. If the Chinese are really worried, the super aircraft carrier will be vulnerable. This does not mean giving up the aircraft carrier. However, the more sensible financial and preparation options may be: Wait until the completion of the construction of the new super-aircraft carrier after the completion of the three super-aircraft carriers under construction, and then renovate about five existing Nimitz-class aircraft carriers.

Another proposition is to further decentralize the deployment of the US fleet and increase efficiency by emphasizing the “distributed kill chain”. This involves increasing the ability of the fleet's ships to fight both the enemy and the self. This increases the threat that the enemy must guard against and the goal that must be eliminated. To some extent, the Navy seems to be considering this strategy. For example, it upgraded the armored weapons and anti-torpedo capabilities of the Littoral Combat Ship.

Inevitably, long-term military thinking is an ability to exercise in predicting the unknowns that former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said. The flight performance of the J-20 fighters only shows that we know very little about China's efforts to build the most advanced advanced army.

Ribbon

Custom Co-Based Amorphous Ribbon,New Type Nano Ribbon,Good Fe-Based Amorphous Ribbon,New Type Co-Based Ribbon

Anyang Kayo Amorphous Technology Co.,Ltd. , https://www.kayoamotech.com